As someone who has spent decades researching fighting game balance (Street Fighter II in 1991) I can tell you that I know what a fighting game that is actually balanced is and what a fighting game that simply feels balanced is. Soul Calibur on the Dreamcast is a fighting game that is actually balanced. Legitimate balanced; “actually balanced” doesn’t mean “balanced for 1999”; “actually balanced” doesn’t mean “the Dreamcast is capable of achieving this level of balance.” What it means is that every character is viable. Every match up is winnable. The frame data functions. The physics function. All of the systems function.
I come from an accounting background, so I appreciate simplicity in systems. That is to say, I don’t believe that systems should be complicated simply for the sake of being complicated. I believe that systems should be simple because they are effective. In that regard, Soul Calibur is a fighting game that exemplifies this idea. That is to say, the designers solved the problem of “how do we make eight characters all viable?” by identifying what makes each character unique and allowing the differences between each character to determine the viability of each character, whilst at the same time preventing any one character from having an unfair advantage.
What Soul Calibur Actually Is
In short, Soul Calibur is a fighting game about eight fighters with weapons. That is literally the entire premise of the game. Sophitia has a sword. Mitsurugi has a katana. Voldo has two swords. Cervantes has cutlasses. Ivy has a whip sword. Astaroth has an axe. Xianghua has a jian. Maxi has nunchucks. Each character’s weapon is not merely cosmetic; it determines how each character will fundamentally interact with the environment.
The ring out mechanic is also critical to the game. This is a 3D fighting game, which means that you can push an opponent off of the stage to win a fight. This creates a spatial element to the gameplay that cannot exist in 2D fighting games. When playing Soul Calibur, you are not simply concerned with executing combos and cancels, you are also concerned with position, managing the distance to your opponent, and using the stage edges in creative ways.
Because Soul Calibur is a 3D fighting game, movement is not simply up and down the screen. You can side step and move in three dimensional space. This adds complexity to the game that is earned, not arbitrary. A high attack can be avoided by either sidestepping or ducking. A mid attack can be sidestepped, but not ducked. A low attack cannot be sidestepped. The game teaches you these concepts as you learn to play, and then rewards you for your knowledge of these concepts.
The Balance That Actually Works
To my mind, the most impressive aspect of Soul Calibur’s balance is that it achieves balance through diversity rather than homogeny. Each character is fundamentally different from the others. Sophitia is all around solid, but she has no extreme strengths or weaknesses. Mitsurugi is aggressive, but his range is limited. Ivy is technically proficient, but her speed is slower than many of the other characters. Astaroth is incredibly strong, but he is slow. Xianghua is very fast, but she deals relatively little damage. As such, the frame data in Soul Calibur is accurate. Each move has a specific startup and recovery time. Combos are possible, but infinite combos are not possible. The risk or reward associated with each move is well balanced. Powerful moves require the player to expose themselves to potential counterattacks. Fast moves deal significantly less damage than slower moves. Each move requires a decision from the player.
Each character’s special moves are unique. Some are fast, some are slow. Some launch for aerial combos. Others serve to defend. Each character has a tool set that is unique to that character alone. As such, there is a wide variety of approaches to competing in the same match up, and players must adapt.
Why The Arcade Version Was Important
Soul Calibur originated in arcades, and the Dreamcast version is an almost perfect port of that version. The characters are identical. The balance is identical. The mechanics are identical. However, the Dreamcast version includes several new features, including new modes and new playable characters. Additionally, the Dreamcast version has several tweaks that would not work in an arcade setting, such as new AI for single player mode.
A good example of an arcade to console port is the Soul Calibur Dreamcast version. The developers did not compromise the core of the game in order to include additional content for home consoles. Instead, they used the base of the arcade version and expanded upon it in meaningful ways. The arcade version of the game is designed for competitive play in arcades. The console version of the game is designed for depth and single player content. Both versions of the game are a complete experience for both casual and competitive players.
That the community of tournament players accepted the Dreamcast version of Soul Calibur as being equal to the arcade version speaks volumes about how faithful the port was. The community of tournament players is notorious for being protective of their source material in arcades. If the Dreamcast version of Soul Calibur had any major changes to the balance, frame data, or physics, competitive players would have rejected the Dreamcast version. They did not.
The Technical Achievement
For its time, the 3D graphics in Soul Calibur are impressive. Not groundbreaking, but clean and easy to read. The character models are detailed, the animations are smooth, and the visual effects are impressive. The backgrounds are detailed enough to create an immersive environment, but not so distracting as to interfere with gameplay. Ultimately, the visuals in Soul Calibur prioritise clarity above all else. In a fighting game, clarity is paramount. You want to be able to clearly see the attack coming. Soul Calibur makes sure you can see the attack coming.
Additionally, the online capability on the Dreamcast was technically impressive. Creating a fighting game netcode that works on a home console in 1999 was a difficult task. The ability to include online multiplayer in Soul Calibur on the Dreamcast indicates that Sega was aware of the importance of developing the necessary infrastructure for online gaming.
Finally, the sound design in Soul Calibur is top notch. The collision between weapons has impact. The voicework is good. The music is atmospheric, but unobtrusive. The audio feedback is quick and clear, making it easy to react quickly to multiple pieces of information in a competitive situation.
Does Soul Calibur Still Hold Up?
Mechanically speaking, yes. The balance of the game is still intact. The movement system still works. The combos are still fun. Whilst the movement system may seem overly complex compared to modern fighting games, the fundamentals of the game are solid. You can easily pick up this game and have a fun time playing a fighting game.
Visually, the game is dated. The roster of playable characters is much smaller than most modern fighting games. The single player content is limited compared to today’s standard. However, the core fighting game experience is still enjoyable.
The ring out mechanic, which felt gimmicky in 1999, is now widely regarded as one of the greatest innovations in fighting games. The ring out mechanic creates a level of strategic depth that few fighting games achieve. Specifically, it prevents fights from devolving into a purely combo based competition, and forces players to consider their positioning relative to their opponent.
Why This Matters For Understanding Fighting Games
Soul Calibur demonstrated that 3D fighting games can be successful, provided they are designed carefully. The space based movement, the unique tools offered by each character’s weapon, and the ring out mechanic, amongst others, were not compromises or gimmicks. Rather, they were innovative elements that added depth and variety to the game.
Since Soul Calibur’s release, most 3D fighting games attempted to emulate Soul Calibur’s formula, but largely failed because they did not realise that Soul Calibur’s success was due to the combination of balance and deliberate design, not simply the use of 3D space. Soul Calibur succeeded because every system supported every other system.
The Verdict
Soul Calibur demonstrates that balance through diversity is preferable to balance through homogenisation. There are eight fully unique characters that are all viable. There is a mechanical system that rewards the player for learning how to manage positioning and movement. The frame data is accurate. The physics model makes sense. The difficulty curve is fair and teaches the player without overwhelming them.
Regardless of whether you are playing Soul Calibur competitively or casually, you will have a great experience. Competitive players can analyse the frame data, and develop optimised combos. Casual players can simply enjoy the variety of playable characters, and the spatial elements of the gameplay.
If you have never played Soul Calibur, I recommend that you play it and understand why 3D fighting games have been attempting to recapture the balance of Soul Calibur for twenty years. If you create fighting games, take note of how Soul Calibur achieves diversity without sacrificing balance.
Rating: 9/10 – The 3D fighting game that proved that balance and 3D fighting games are not mutually exclusive
Return to our full Dreamcast rankings
Samuel’s been gaming since the Atari 2600 and still thinks 16-bit was the golden age. Between accounting gigs and parenting teens, he keeps the CRTs humming in his Minneapolis basement, writing about cartridge quirks, console wars, and why pixel art never stopped being beautiful.
0 Comments