When I think back to the exact instant when I realised what Ocarina of Time was doing, I don’t remember it was when I booted the game up for the first time. What I remember is three hours in, standing in the Lost Woods and finally figuring out the path wasn’t random but instead it was tied directly to the music cues. At that moment I knew Nintendo took a 2D puzzle game and translated it perfectly into three dimensions — and did so without changing a single design principle. And at that moment I realised that this wasn’t just a great N64 game; it was a game that would define what 3D adventure gaming looked like for the next twenty years.
I started playing video games when the Amstrad was still a relatively new gaming console. Twenty five minutes to load a game, crashing at the most inconvenient time, graphics that were barely recognisable as anything close to realistic… you develop a certain amount of patience when waiting to load a game, and an appreciation for design that takes that patience into consideration. Ocarina of Time took that patience completely into account. Every system worked together. Each mechanic supported the larger design. Nothing was wasted.
What Makes Ocarina of Time So Special?
You start as a child in the Kokiri Forest. This is an isolated village, and all the other children have their own fairy companion. You encounter Navi, a fairy who is both helpful and extremely annoying (Navi would eventually become even more annoying in Majora’s Mask, but that is another story). The village is small, the dungeons are straightforward, and the puzzles teach you the basic mechanics of movement in 3D space. Once you obtain the Ocarina from the Great Deku Tree, everything changes.
As a child, you explore Hyrule Field. For 1998, it was incredibly large, with Lon Lon Ranch, the Lost Woods, Lake Hylia, and Kakariko Village all interconnected and accessible. You complete dungeons, acquire new items, and gradually move closer to battling Ganon. Then the narrative twist occurs — you pull the Master Sword and are sucked into the Sacred Realm, waking up as adult Link in a post apocalyptic Hyrule seven years later. Everything has fallen apart. The castle is destroyed. The villages are ruins. Ganon has actually succeeded.
That’s bold design. Most games feature a clearly defined villain you’re trying to stop before it becomes a problem. Ocarina stated “Ganon wins by halfway” and then made the second half of the game about surviving in the world resulting from his victory. The seven year jump isn’t simply a plot device — it’s a psychological reboot. You’re not the same Link. You’re older, stronger, but the world is darker. It altered the pacing in ways that seem obvious today, but were truly innovative in 1998.
Time Travel Should Be Gimmicky. It Isn’t.
Using the time travel concept shouldn’t be gimmicky. It isn’t. The design utilises the time travel concept to teach. Young Link cannot climb high enough — you will need the Hookshot or Longshot as adult Link to access those areas. Young Link is smaller and can enter spaces that adult Link cannot. Young Link can play the Ocarina to produce special effects such as the Sun’s Song, which disables ReDeads that would normally be untouchable by young Link due to the lack of light. The two versions of Link aren’t merely cosmetic differences — they fundamentally alter how you approach problems and explore the environment. The realisation that a puzzle that cannot be solved as young Link becomes trivially easy once you possess the correct tools as adult Link provides a feeling of satisfaction from realising the intent of the designers.
Respecting the Player’s Commitment
Ocarina of Time features eight main dungeons before you reach Ganon’s Tower, and each of these dungeons is an example of a masterfully created 3D environment. The Deku Tree Dungeon is designed to educate the player on the fundamentals of navigation in 3D space, reading elevation levels, and solving basic block puzzles. By the time you reach Turtle Rock, you’ll be dealing with complex multi level environments, timed events, and boss battles that require mastery of every tool you’ve acquired.
Forest Temple is intentionally confusing upon initial entry — you wander through the twisted woods and can’t determine your route. However, when you collect the Poe Sisters, you begin to realise that the sisters actually serve to open up additional routes within the temple. Suddenly, everything falls into place. The Fire Temple is a massive volcano with a water level that you control with the Hookshot, creating multiple layers of height and access to previously inaccessible areas. The Water Temple in Lake Hylia — yes, it has a bad reputation for being confusing, and it is, but when you realise the vertical organisation of the temple, it begins to make sense. You are solving a three dimensional puzzle where each layer of water exposes different rooms depending on the water level.
Each dungeon teaches you something and then expects you to implement that knowledge. The Spirit Temple gives you the Mirror Shield midway through the temple, and then the final boss fight relies on your ability to utilise the shield. The Shadow Temple introduces you to invisible platforms and the Lens of Truth, and the final boss fight is a test of how effectively you can use those tools. That is not coincidental design — that is developers who understood that learning through gameplay is exponentially more successful than through tutorials.
Final Boss Battles Are a Test of Your Knowledge
Boss battles in Ocarina of Time are a test of whether or not you have truly learned the concepts presented in the previous dungeon. Properly defeated, the boss battles are not brutally difficult — they are satisfying representations of your ability to utilise the tools you’ve obtained. A few hits and you’ll learn fast. The patterns are obvious. You’re not fighting against impossible odds — you’re implementing the strategies you developed.
A Responsive Environment
Hyrule Field in Ocarina of Time is enormous for 1998 hardware. You can see the entire field. There is no fog obscuring your view of the horizon. The Ocarina Songs allow you to modify the world — Time Warp to switch between young and adult Link versions, Epona’s Song to call your horse, Saria’s Song to receive assistance from friendly NPCs. The Sun’s Song freezes ReDeads in darkness — it’s not just a practical tool for the battle — it’s also thematically appropriate to a song called after the sun.
The overworld is filled with secrets that reward attention to detail. Cracked walls that can be bombed to reveal a secret passage. Chickens that, if annoyed sufficiently, attack you (this is surprisingly menacing, honestly). Money hidden beneath rocks. Heart pieces available throughout the overworld for players looking to enhance their maximum health. The game never forces you to discover these items — it’s all optional. However, the design consistently encourages you to seek out clues.
What I find fascinating now is how much respect Ocarina has for the player’s intelligence. You are not following a series of quest markers. There are no lists of objectives dictating what to do. You speak with NPCs, you gather information, you decide which direction to go based on those conversations and your own exploration. The carpenter in Kakariko Village is working in the Lost Woods because there is construction taking place there. You have to make that connection yourself.
Both the transition from young Link to adult Link are a combination of gameplay and world design. The forest area of Kokiri is quiet and slightly unsettling when you are an adult. Lon Lon Ranch feels deserted when you are young because Talon is sleeping. The Lost Woods feel different depending on whether you are in either form of Link. The designers spent considerable time thinking about how time would affect location and mood.
Why Does It Matter Today?
Ocarina of Time released in 1998 when 3D gaming was still finding its footing. Sony had demonstrated that 3D gaming was possible with the release of the PlayStation. Super Mario 64 had shown that 3D platformers could succeed. Ocarina of Time showed that you could convert a 2D adventure game (with its carefully designed dungeons, item gated exploration, and structured narrative) to 3D whilst retaining every element that made it successful.
The Z Targeting System Would Become the Industry Standard
The Z targeting system utilised in Ocarina would establish itself as the industry standard for third person action games for the next two decades. You can clearly demonstrate the lineage from Ocarina’s target system to how Dark Souls handles lock on, how modern Zelda games deal with combat, how almost every action game deals with camera and targeting systems today. That is not coincidence — that is a genuine elegant solution to a technological problem that established the industry standard.
However, what really impresses me today — after watching gaming grow for nearly four decades — is how complete Ocarina of Time was. There were no compromises. The dungeons were fully formed. The overworld was cohesive. The narrative flowed between the two time periods. The optional content enhanced the experience and didn’t pad it. From a 1998 perspective, the technical achievements of the game were significant. Today, they remain relevant due to the solidness of the design.
Still Worth Playing Today?
Absolutely. I replayed Ocarina of Time for this piece and it remains remarkably fresh today. The controls react perfectly once you become accustomed to them. The camera — which was universally criticised for being poor at the time — operates perfectly once you utilise the target system, which you probably should anyway. The dungeons still contain clever solutions to puzzles. The pacing still works. The narrative still hits the mark.
The Ocarina Songs are not simply mechanical conveniences — they integrate perfectly into the world. Using the Sun’s Song to bring forth sunlight isn’t simply a game mechanic — it’s thematically accurate to a song named after the sun. The entire game rewards the player’s ability to understand the game as opposed to simply execute it.
Modern Quality of Life Improvements Would Be Welcome
Quality of life improvements — such as an NPC journal showing which NPCs provided which hints, or perhaps a marker system for which optional quests you are attempting to complete — would certainly improve the overall experience of Ocarina of Time today. However, the fundamental experience does not need improvement. Ocarina of Time is a game made at a time when developers still believed in the player’s ability to figure things out, and that faith is a major reason why the game succeeds.
Conclusion
Ocarina of Time is not merely the greatest N64 game — it is one of the greatest adventure games of all time. Not “for its time,” not “given the hardware,” but genuinely one of the greatest. The design is elegant. The dungeons are magnificent. The pacing is perfect. The narrative structure is clever without being overly complicated. The optional content enhances the game without padding it. Each aspect of the game supports every other aspect of the game.
Technical limitations forced creative solutions. Careful design was necessary due to the physical limitations of the cartridge. The controller was unfamiliar, thus the camera system needed to function. The hardware limitations dictated every pixel counted. As a result, we have a game where nothing is wasted, every component serves a purpose, and the entire experience is far greater than the sum of its components.
If you have never played Ocarina of Time, you should play it. If you played Ocarina as a child and haven’t revisited it in years, you should replay it and recognise how well the game has aged. If you’re developing an adventure game, look to Ocarina as a model for what a superior experience looks like.
Rating: 10/10 — The Game That Proved 3D Adventure Gaming Could Be Done Perfectly
Return to our full N64 rankings
Carl discovered retro gaming through the load times of cassettes and swapping discs, and this taught him that excellent design is not about flashy visuals — it is about demonstrating respect for the player’s time. Carl currently resides in Hampshire, England, and writes from a position of authority, having witnessed gaming hardware development from tape reels to SSDs, and having seen little reason to complain.
Carl
0 Comments